Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura (JEBAV) focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turnitin.

Review Process:

1. Author submit the manuscript

2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]

3. Double-blind peer review process

4. Editor Decision

5. Confirmation to the authors

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.

Reviewer Guideline

Components and evaluation indicator Reviewers assessment are described in the following Table:

No

Component

Evaluation Indicator of reviewer

1

Title

Effectiveness, Specification and clarity

2

Abstract (in English)

Complete and describe the essence of article

3

Keywords

Describing the essential concept of article

4

Introduction (background, Objective or scope, literature Review)

Up-to-date, originality, relevance of the Topic, compatibility of the important reason of the research objective

5

Methods

Accuracy, Specification, and clarity

6

Results (Analysis and Synthetic)

Analysis acuteness

7

Discussion (Interpretation)

Up-to-date finding, relevance to the interrelated researches, and the scientific contribution effect of finding /idea to the development of science

8

Conclusion

Logical, valid, brief and clear

9

Suggestion

For practical action, development of new theory, and next/advanced research

10

Bibliography

Degree of up-to-date and the reference of primary book sources.

Rules: at least 90% of the journals or the interrelated scientific researches, above 2008 (year)