The Mediating Role of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Organizational Citizen Behavior in the Influence of Strategic Performance Measurement System on Employee Performance in the Indonesian Ministry of Finance
PDF
PDF

Keywords

Strategic Performance Measurement System
distributive justice
procedural justice
organizational citizen behavior
employee performance

How to Cite

Prihatiningtias, Y. W., & Julianto, S. W. (2020). The Mediating Role of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Organizational Citizen Behavior in the Influence of Strategic Performance Measurement System on Employee Performance in the Indonesian Ministry of Finance. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1976

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the Strategic Performance Measurement System (SPMS) on the employees’ performance through distributive justice, procedural justice, and Organizational Citizen Behavior (OCB) as the mediating variables. The respondents are the staffs and junior supervisors at the General Directorate of Treasury (GDT) of the Ministry of Finance, one of the agencies initiating the implementation of SPMS in the Indonesian public sector institution. Two hundred forty-nine data were collected using a survey method. Data analysis was performed using the structural equation model. The results show that SPMS directly affect the employees’ performance and significantly has a positive effect on distributive justice and procedural justice. Distributive justice has a positive impact on procedural justice. Procedural justice itself has a positive impact on OCB. Furthermore, OCB has a positive impact on employee performance. In addition, the effect of SPMS on the employees’ performance is mediated by distributive justice, procedural justice, and OCB. Besides that, the relationship can also be mediated only by procedural justice and OCB. Both alternatives show a complementary partial mediation relationship. This implies that the remuneration rubric, as the reflection of SPMS, needs to be matched with the individual and job characteristics, supported by the senior supervisors as the policy makers.

References

Adams, J. S. (1963). Wage inequities, productivity and work quality. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 3(1), 9-16. doi:10.1111/j.1468-232X.1963.tb00805.x

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.

Al-Sharabi, M. S., & Auzair, S. M. (2018). The Relationships among Controllability of Objective Performance Measures, Distributive and Procedural Justice: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management (IJBMM), 3, 19-25 ISSN: 2456-4559

Alotaibai, A. G. (2001). Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Study of Public Personnel in Kuwait. Public Personnel Management, 30(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600103000306

Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77-85.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Slider 9 gambar (bolak balik autoplay)