Research on Paradox in Strategic Management: a Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021

Ahmad Faiz Khudlari Thoha

doi:10.14414/jbb.v12i2.3296

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022), Articles

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022)

Research on Paradox in Strategic Management: a Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021

Articles

DOI: 10.14414/jbb.v12i2.3296

Published 2023-04-26

Ahmad Faiz Khudlari Thoha⁺⁻

Ahmad Faiz Khudlari Thoha

STIDKI Ar Rahmah Surabaya

PDF

Keywords

Bibliometric
Paradox
Strategic management
Strategy
Tension

How to Cite

Thoha, A. F. K. (2023). Research on Paradox in Strategic Management: a Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021. Journal of Business & Banking, 12(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v12i2.3296

Abstract

The sustainability of strategic management processes demands the accommodation of different expectations. The idea of paradox encourages organizational leaders to manage conflicts by accommodating the competing impulses. In the past quarter century, the theory of paradox and its continuous evolution has evolved dramatically, presenting excellent opportunities amid the speed of technological progress, reduced resources, and diverse customer expectations. The study comprehensively analyzes paradoxical concepts in current strategic management research and explores future related literature development opportunities. The bibliometric analysis method was used in this study to map and evaluate trends of paradox in strategic management domains using a statistical approach to 633 articles from Scopus. The results show that paradox in strategic management has implications related to servitization, open innovation, organizational change, ambidexterity, knowledge sharing, diversity, value creation, corporate sustainability, dynamic capabilities, and social entrepreneurship. The results of this study can guide the researchers to develop paradoxical research in the field of strategic management in the future.

References

Andriopoulos, C. and Lewis, M.W. (2009) â€˜Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovationâ€™, Organization Science, 20(4), pp. 696â€“717. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.

Audebrand, L.K. (2017) â€˜Expanding the scope of paradox schol-arship on social enterprise: The case for (re)introducing worker cooperativesâ€™, Management (France), 20(4), pp. 368â€“393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.204.0368.

Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A. and Smith, K.G. (2000) â€˜The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic per-sistence following radical environmental changeâ€™, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), pp. 837â€“853. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413.

Awad and Krishnan (2006) â€˜The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalizationâ€™, MIS Quarterly, 30(1), p. 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715.

Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000) â€˜Cracking the code of change.â€™, Harvard Business Review, 78(3), pp. 133â€“141, 216. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.00034188746&partnerID=40&md5=13e1de2c51a4dd2bd07fedbb25150261.

There are 81 references. More references >>

Andriopoulos, C. and Lewis, M.W. (2009) â€˜Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovationâ€™, Organization Science, 20(4), pp. 696â€“717. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.

Audebrand, L.K. (2017) â€˜Expanding the scope of paradox schol-arship on social enterprise: The case for (re)introducing worker cooperativesâ€™, Management (France), 20(4), pp. 368â€“393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.204.0368.

Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A. and Smith, K.G. (2000) â€˜The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic per-sistence following radical environmental changeâ€™, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), pp. 837â€“853. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413.

Awad and Krishnan (2006) â€˜The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalizationâ€™, MIS Quarterly, 30(1), p. 13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715.

Beer, M. and Nohria, N. (2000) â€˜Cracking the code of change.â€™, Harvard Business Review, 78(3), pp. 133â€“141, 216. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.00034188746&partnerID=40&md5=13e1de2c51a4dd2bd07fedbb25150261.

Bengtsson, M., Raza-Ullah, T. and Srivastava, M.K. (2020) â€˜Look-ing different vs thinking differently: Impact of TMT diversi-ty on coopetition capabilityâ€™, Long Range Planning, 53(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.11.001.

Benson, J.K. (1977) â€˜Organizations: A Dialectical Viewâ€™, Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 22(1), p. 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391741.

BriÃ¨re, S. and Auclair, I. (2020) â€˜Toward gendered projects in in-ternational development: Paradoxes, resistance and con-vergent approachesâ€™, International Journal of Project Manage-ment, 38(8), pp. 500â€“514. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.004.

Brown, T., Park, A. and Pitt, L. (2020) â€˜A 60-Year Bibliographic Review Of the Journal of Advertising Researchâ€™, Journal of Advertising Research, 60(4), pp. 353â€“360.

Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E. (1988) â€˜Organizational paradox and transformationâ€™, Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, pp. 1â€“18.

Carmine, S. and Smith, W.K. (2021) â€˜Organizational Paradoxâ€™, in Management. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0201.

Carollo, L. and Guerci, M. (2018) â€˜â€œActivists in a Suitâ€: Paradoxes and Metaphors in Sustainability Managersâ€™ Identity Workâ€™, Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), pp. 249â€“268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3582-7.

Carvalho, M.M., Fleury, A. and Lopes, A.P. (2013) â€˜An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Con-tributions and trendsâ€™, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), pp. 1418â€“1437. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.008.

Child, C. (2020) â€˜Whence Paradox? Framing Away the Potential Challenges of Doing Well by Doing Good in Social Enter-prise Organizationsâ€™, Organization Studies, 41(8), pp. 1147â€“1167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619857467.

Clegg, S.R., Vieira Da Cunha, J. and Pina E Cunha, M. (2002) â€˜Management paradoxes: A relational viewâ€™, Human Rela-tions, 55(5), pp. 483â€“503. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702555001.

Cobo, M.J. et al. (2011) â€˜Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among toolsâ€™, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), pp. 1382â€“1402. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.

Cunha, M.P. e. and Putnam, L.L. (2019) â€˜Paradox theory and the paradox of successâ€™, Strategic Organization, 17(1), pp. 95â€“106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536.

van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2010) â€˜Software survey: VOSview-er, a computer program for bibliometric mappingâ€™, Scien-tometrics, 84(2), pp. 523â€“538. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2014) â€˜Visualizing bibliometric networksâ€™, Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, pp. 285â€“320.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (2000) â€˜Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralismâ€™, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), pp. 703â€“705.

Eisenhardt, K.M., Furr, N.R. and Bingham, C.B. (2010) â€˜Micro-foundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexi-bility in dynamic environmentsâ€™, Organization Science, 21(6), pp. 1263â€“1273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564.

Erdogan, I., Rondi, E. and de Massis, A. (2020) â€˜Managing the Tradition and Innovation Paradox in Family Firms: A Fami-ly Imprinting Perspectiveâ€™, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Prac-tice, 44(1), pp. 20â€“54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719839712.

Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. and Davarzani, H. (2015) â€˜Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysisâ€™, In-ternational Journal of Production Economics, 162, pp. 101â€“114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003.

Fairhurst, G.T. et al. (2016) â€˜Diverging and Converging: Integra-tive Insights on a Paradox Meta-perspectiveâ€™, The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), pp. 173â€“182. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162423.

Falagas, M.E. et al. (2008) â€˜Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknessesâ€™, FASEB Journal, 22(2), pp. 338â€“342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.

Gaim, M. and WÃ¥hlin, N. (2016) â€˜In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical ten-sionsâ€™, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32(1), pp. 33â€“44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.12.002.

Gao, H., Ding, X.-H. and Wu, S. (2020) â€˜Exploring the domain of open innovation: Bibliometric and content analysesâ€™, Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, p. 122580. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122580.

Hahn, T. and Figge, F. (2018) â€˜Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecardsâ€™, Jour-nal of Business Ethics, 150(4), pp. 919â€“935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3135-5.

Hargrave, T.J. and van de Ven, A.H. (2017) â€˜Integrating Dialecti-cal and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organizationsâ€™, Organization Studies, 38(3â€“4), pp. 319â€“339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640843.

Hossain, N.U.I. et al. (2020) â€˜Systems thinking: A review and bib-liometric analysisâ€™, Systems, 8(3), pp. 1â€“26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8030023.

Irava, W.J. and Moores, K. (2010) â€˜Clarifying the strategic ad-vantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and high-lighting its paradoxesâ€™, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), pp. 131â€“144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.002.

Janssens, M. and Steyaert, C. (1999) â€˜The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practiceâ€™, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15(2), pp. 121â€“139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(98)00010-4.

Joseph, J. et al. (2020) â€˜Seeing Versus Doing: How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainabilityâ€™, Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), pp. 349â€“370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4065-1.

Kale, P. and Singh, H. (2009) â€˜Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here?â€™, Acade-my of Management Perspectives, 23(3), pp. 45â€“62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.43479263.

KohtamÃ¤ki, M., Rabetino, R. and MÃ¶ller, K. (2018) â€˜Alliance ca-pabilities: A systematic review and future research direc-tionsâ€™, Industrial Marketing Management, 68, pp. 188â€“201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.014.

Lado, A.A. et al. (2006) â€˜Paradox and theorizing within the re-source-based viewâ€™, Academy of Management Review, 31(1), pp. 115â€“131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379627.

Lannon, J. and Walsh, J.N. (2020) â€˜Paradoxes and partnerships: a study of knowledge exploration and exploitation in interna-tional development programmesâ€™, Journal of Knowledge Man-agement, 24(1), pp. 8â€“31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2018-0605.

Laursen, K. and Salter, A.J. (2014) â€˜The paradox of openness: Ap-propriability, external search and collaborationâ€™, Research Policy, 43(5), pp. 867â€“878. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004.

Lewis, M.W. (2000) â€˜Exploring paradox: Toward a more compre-hensive guideâ€™, Academy of Management Review, 25(4), pp. 760â€“776. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712.

Lewis, M.W., Andriopoulos, C. and Smith, W.K. (2014) â€˜Paradox-ical Leadership to Enable Strategic Agilityâ€™, California Man-agement Review, 56(3), pp. 58â€“77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58.

Lewis, M.W. and Smith, W.K. (2014) â€˜Paradox as a Metatheoreti-cal Perspective: Sharpening the Focus and Widening the Scopeâ€™, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), pp. 127â€“149. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314522322.

LÃ¶vstÃ¥l, E. and Jontoft, A.-M. (2017) â€˜Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature reviewâ€™, Journal of Management Control, 28(1), pp. 41â€“79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0244-3.

LÃ¼scher, L.S. and Lewis, M.W. (2008) â€˜Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradoxâ€™, Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), pp. 221â€“240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767217.

Mahadevan, K. and Joshi, S. (2022) â€˜Omnichannel retailing: a bib-liometric and network visualization analysisâ€™, Benchmarking, 29(4), pp. 1113â€“1136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2020-0622.

Mason, C. and Doherty, B. (2016) â€˜A Fair Trade-off? Paradoxes in the Governance of Fair-trade Social Enterprisesâ€™, Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), pp. 451â€“469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2511-2.

McBurney, M.K. and Novak, P.L. (2002) â€˜What is bibliometrics and why should you care?â€™, in Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. IEEE, pp. 108â€“114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094.

McMullen, J.S. and Bergman, B.J. (2017) â€˜Social Entrepreneurship and the Development Paradox of Prosocial Motivation: A Cautionary Taleâ€™, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), pp. 243â€“270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1263.

MerigÃ³, J.M. et al. (2018) â€˜Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overviewâ€™, Information Sciences, 432, pp. 245â€“268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054.

MilojeviÄ‡, S. (2014) â€˜Network analysis and indicatorsâ€™, Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, pp. 57â€“82.

Mintzberg, H. (1987) â€˜Crafting Strategyâ€™, Crafting Strategy, pp. 66â€“75.

Park, A. et al. (2020) â€˜Understanding fake news: a bibliographic perspectiveâ€™, Def. Strateg. Commun, 8, pp. 141â€“172.

Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L. and van Eck, N.J. (2016) â€˜Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison be-tween full and fractional countingâ€™, Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), pp. 1178â€“1195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006.

Pinto, G. et al. (2020) â€˜Bibliometric study on dividend policyâ€™, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(1), pp. 72â€“95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-11-2018-0118.

Pitt, C., Park, A. and McCarthy, I.P. (2021) â€˜A bibliographic analy-sis of 20 years of research on innovation and new product development in technology and innovation management (TIM) journalsâ€™, Journal of Engineering and Technology Man-agement - JET-M, 61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101632.

Putnam, L.L. (1986) â€˜Contradictions and paradoxes in organiza-tionsâ€™, Organization Communications: Emerging Perspectives, pp. 151â€“167.

Putnam, L.L., Fairhurst, G.T. and Banghart, S. (2016) â€˜Contradic-tions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Consti-tutive Approach â€ â€™, The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), pp. 65â€“171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421.

Raza-Ullah, T. (2020) â€˜Experiencing the paradox of coopetition: A moderated mediation framework explaining the paradoxi-cal tensionâ€“performance relationshipâ€™, Long Range Planning, 53(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.003.

Rey-Garcia, M., Mato-Santiso, V. and Felgueiras, A. (2021) â€˜Tran-sitioning Collaborative Cross-Sector Business Models for Sustainability Innovation: Multilevel Tension Management as a Dynamic Capabilityâ€™, Business and Society, 60(5), pp. 1132â€“1173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320949822.

Ricciardi, F., Zardini, A. and Rossignoli, C. (2016) â€˜Organization-al dynamism and adaptive business model innovation: The triple paradox configurationâ€™, Journal of Business Research, 69(11), pp. 5487â€“5493. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.154.

Rondi, E., de Massis, A. and Kotlar, J. (2019) â€˜Unlocking innova-tion potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family systemâ€™, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001.

Rowley, J. and Slack, F. (2004) â€˜Conducting a literature reviewâ€™, Management Research News, 27(6), pp. 31â€“39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185.

Schad, J. et al. (2016) â€˜Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forwardâ€™, The Academy of Manage-ment Annals, 10(1), pp. 5â€“64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422.

Schad, J., Lewis, M.W. and Smith, W.K. (2019) â€˜Quo vadis, para-dox? Centripetal and centrifugal forces in theory develop-mentâ€™, Strategic Organization, 17(1), pp. 107â€“119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018786218.

Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G. and Seidl, D. (2013) â€˜Managing Legiti-macy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sus-tainable Development in a Globalized Worldâ€™, Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), pp. 259â€“284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12014.

Sheep, M.L., Fairhurst, G.T. and Khazanchi, S. (2017) â€˜Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-offâ€™, Organization Studies, 38(3â€“4), pp. 463â€“488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640845.

Slawinski, N. and Bansal, P. (2012) â€˜A Matter of Time: The Tem-poral Perspectives of Organizational Responses to Climate Changeâ€™, Organization Studies, 33(11), pp. 1537â€“1563. Availa-ble at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612463319.

Smith, W. and Lewis, M. (2011) â€˜Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizingâ€™, Academy of Management Review, 36(2), pp. 381â€“403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223.

Smith, W.K., Binns, A. and Tushman, M.L. (2010) â€˜Complex Busi-ness Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneous-lyâ€™, Long Range Planning, 43(2â€“3), pp. 448â€“461. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.12.003.

Smith, W.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2011) â€˜Toward a Theory of Para-dox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizingâ€™, Acade-my of Management Review, 36(2), pp. 381â€“403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223.

Smith, W.K. and Tracey, P. (2016) â€˜Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing de-mandsâ€™, Strategic Organization, 14(4), pp. 455â€“466. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016638565.

Smith, W.K. and Tushman, M.L. (2005) â€˜Managing strategic con-tradictions: A top management model for managing innova-tion streamsâ€™, Organization Science, 16(5), pp. 522â€“536. Avail-able at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134.

Szentes, H. (2018) â€˜Reinforcing cycles involving inter- and in-traorganizational paradoxical tensions when managing large construction projectsâ€™, Construction Management and Economics, 36(3), pp. 125â€“140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1315826.

Tse, T. (2013) â€˜Paradox resolution: A means to achieve strategic innovationâ€™, European Management Journal, 31(6), pp. 682â€“696. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.05.001.

Visnjic Kastalli, I. and van Looy, B. (2013) â€˜Servitization: Disen-tangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performanceâ€™, Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), pp. 169â€“180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.02.001.

Vogel, R. and GÃ¼ttel, W.H. (2012) â€˜The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Reviewâ€™, Interna-tional Journal of Management Reviews, p. n/a-n/a. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000.

Wallin, J.A. (2005) â€˜Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibili-tiesâ€™, Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 97(5), pp. 261â€“275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x.

Weiss, L. and K. Kanbach, D. (2021) â€˜Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambi-dexterity as a dynamic capabilityâ€™, Management Review Quar-terly [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00223-y.

West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006) â€˜Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source softwareâ€™, R and D Management, 36(3), pp. 319â€“331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x.

WÃ³jcik, P. (2020) â€˜Paradoxical nature of dynamic capabilities re-search: a content analysis of literatureâ€™, Baltic Journal of Man-agement, 15(5), pp. 727â€“755. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-08-2019-0289.

Zehendner, A.G. et al. (2021) â€˜Paradoxical tensions in sustainable supply chain management: insights from the electronics multi-tier supply chain contextâ€™, International Journal of Oper-ations and Production Management, 41(6), pp. 882â€“907. Avail-able at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2020-0709.

Zupic, I. and ÄŒater, T. (2015) â€˜Bibliometric Methods in Manage-ment and Organizationâ€™, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), pp. 429â€“472. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.

Research on Paradox in Strategic Management: a Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2021

Keywords

How to Cite

Download Citation

Abstract

References