Pengaruh model bisnis canvasing terhadap risiko pada industri fintech P2P lending Indonesia

Mohammad Fahmi Arkanuddin, Bernardus Yuliarto Nugroho, Chandra Wijaya

Abstract


This quantitative study aims to analyze the significant effect of the application of the canvasing business model on risk. The data were analysed using structural equation modeling (SEM) on 100 respondents through the distribution of questionnaires. In addition, interviews were also conducted with several P2P lending fintech stakeholders to obtain an in-depth analysis of the problem. The result showed that the canvasing business model variable has a significant effect on risk with an estimate of 0.871. The P2P lending fintech industry has an inherent risk, namely credit risk and there are 7
(seven) components of the canvasing business model (CBM) that have a correlation to credit risk and the risk of the COVID-19 pandemic. Credit risk due to NPL caused by unbanked and underserved can be mitigated by implementing the CBM components and the customer segments. The application of customer segments and keys of partnership can mitigate fraudster. Over debt can be mitigated by the application of a key of partnership. Meanwhile, the risk of pandemic-covid 19 is one type of risk that is added for research in addition to 8 (eight) types of risk, which can be mitigated by implement-ing one component or element of CBM. CBM is a channel, by utilizing e-channels, through the use and use of mobile applications.


Keywords


Fintech, Fintech P2P lending, Canvasing business model, Risk and SEM.

Full Text:

PDF

References


AFPI (2019). Enam Faktor Penyebab Tingkat Wanprestasi Pinjaman atau TWP Fintech P2P lending.

APJII (2016-2020). Hasil survei oleh Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa In-ternet Indonesia. Buletin APJII, Edisi 40 – Mei 2019. Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019-2020 (Q2)

Blanchard, Oliver. (2015). Sosial Media ROI: Mengelola dan Men-gukur Penggunaan Media Sosial pada Organisasi Anda. Jakarta: PT. Elex Me-dia Komputindo.

Berger, Charles R., Roloff, Michael, E. and Ewoldsen, David, R., (2010). Handbook For Communication Science. DOI: 10.4135/9781412 982818, Edition: 2nd Edition Publisher: Sage ISBN: 978-1412918138.

Chanona, R Maria del Rio, Mealy Penny, Pichler, Anton, Lafond, François, Farmer, J Doyne (2020), Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspec-tive. © CEPR Press, 2020

Creswell (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Method Approaches. Edition: 3rd.Publisher: Sage Publi-cations. January 2009

Garvey, K. et al. (2017). The 2nd Asia Pacific Region Alternative Fi-nance Industry Report - Cultivating Growth (September). Cam-bridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF). London: Universi-ty of Cam-bridge.

Ge, Feng, Gu and Zhang (2017), Predicting and Deterring Default With Social Media Information In Peer To Peer Lending. Journal of Man-agement Information System. Volume 34, Issue Number 2. Published April 3, 2017. https ://asu.pure.Elsevier.com/en/ publications/predicting-and-deterring-default-with-social-media-information-in.

Giudici, Paolo (2018), Fintech risk management: A reaserch challenge for artificial intelligence in Finance. Department of economics and management, university of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. Published November 27, 2018. Doi: 10.3389/frai.2018.00001.

Ghozali, I., dan Latan, H. (2012). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program Smart PLS 2.0 M3. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Grier, Waymond, A., (2007). Credit Analysis of Financial Institu-tion.2007. Second Edition.

Hsueh, S., and Kuo, H. (2017). Effective Matching for P2P Lending by Mining Strong Association Rules. ICIBE 2017: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Business En-gineering. Au-gust, 2017, 30–33. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3133811. 3133823

Imerman, Michael B. and Fabozzi, Frank J., (2020), Cashing in on inno-vation: a taxonomy of FinTech. Journal of Asset Manage-ment (2020) 21:167–177. https: // doi.org / 10.1057 /s41260-020-00163-4. Published online: 9 May 2020 © Springer Nature Limited 2020.

Jöreskog (1967).General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likeli-hood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika.34:183–202.

Joreskog (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: A.S. Goldberger, O.D. Duncan (eds.), Struc-tural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 5–112).

Kirby and Bollen (2009).An Empirical Evaluation of The Use Of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research.36:462–494.

Malhotra, N.K, (2007), Marketing Research an Applied Orientation. 5th Edition. New Jersey; Pearson Education.

Manurung, Adler Haymans (2018). Mitigasi Risiko dengan Model Bisnis Kanvas.: http://www.finansialbisnis.com/Jurnal/Mitigasi %20Risiko%20dengan%20Model%20Bisnis%20Kanvas.pdf.

OJK (2020, Maret). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia.

OJK (2020, September). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia

Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y. (2017). Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. Ho-boken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

PBI No.19/12/PBI/2017 tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Finan-sial (PBI Tekfin).

POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang layanan pinjam-meminjan uang berbasis teknologi informasi.

Rehmood and Khan, (2011).The Impact of E-Media on Customer Purchase Intention. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA .2011.020317.

Saunders and Cornett, (2007), Financial Institution Management: A Risk Management Approach. Sixth Edition. Boston: The McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Smith and Liehr (1999).Middle Range Theory: Spinning Research and Practice to Create Knowledge for the new Millennium. Advanc-ing in Nursing Science 21(4), 81- 91.

Smith and Liehr (1999).Attentively Embracing Story: A Middle-Range Theory with Practice and Research Implications. Scholar-ly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 13, 187-204.

Štefan, Slavik and Richard, Bednár (2014), Analysis of Business Models. Journal of Competitiveness. Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp. 19-40. ISSN 1804-171X. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2014.04.02

Strauss and Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. New York: Sage Publications

Strauss and Corbin (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. 2nd. edition, Sage Publica-tions, Newbury Park, CA

Turban, Efraim, R. Kelly Rainer, Jr, and Richard E. Potter, (2005). In-tro-duction To Information Technology. 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons, United States.

Williams, Brian K. and Sawyer, Stancey, C. (2010). Using Infor-mation Technology. Eight Edition. Published by McGraw Hill.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v11i2.2845

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracting & Indexing

    

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.