Impacts of in-kind transfer to household’s budget proportion: Evidence from early reformation in Indonesia


  • Albertus Girik-Allo The University of Papua
  • Yuyun Puji Rahayu The University of Papua
  • Ni Made Sukartini Airlangga University



Raskin program, Normal Good, Fixed Effect Model, Instrumental Variable


The program distributing rice for reducing poverty for poor household (also known as Raskin) is one of social safety net programs in Indonesian’s government with its subsidized rice to the poor. The purpose of this program is to lessen the financial burden of the targeted households and increase food sustainability at the household level. This paper’s aim is to investigate how the effect of in-kind transfer towards the Raskin program over the household’s budgets proportion. This study used Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) data wave 3 (2000) and wave 4 (2007), with the households level as unit analysis. Estimation strategy is applying regression with data panel in fixed effect model (FEM) and instrumental variable (IV). The result shows that the in-kind transfer program is not work for lessening the household’s burden, but in fact has increased the household expenditure, particularly for buying some food. It was found that during the program implementation, there was a significant increase in informal labor wages in Indonesia. Therefore, for typical household who experiencing higher wage income relatives to rice expenditure, will result in total budgets for rice will also increase significantly. In this case, we could conclude that rice is still being normal goods for Indonesia..


Ahmed, AU 2005, Comparing food and cash incentive for schooling in Bangladesh, Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institut (IFPRI).

Ariani, M 2007, Konsumsi Pangan Masyarakat Indonesia: Analisis Data Susenas 1999-2005, Gizi Indonesia, 30 (1), 47-56.

Bacon, R, Bhattacharya, S & Kojima, M 2010, Expenditure of Low Income Households on Energy: Evidence from Africa and Asia, Working Paper No. 16, Extractive Industries for Development, Oil, Gas, and Mining.

Breunig, R & Dasgupta, I 2005, Do Intra Household Effects Generate the Food Stamp Cash Out Puzzle?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics,87 (3), 552-568.

Cameron, L & Williams, J 2009, Is the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Health Stronger for Older Children in Developing Countries?, Demography, 46(2), pp. 303-324.

Chen, S & Ravallion, M 2010, The Developing World is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in The Fight Against Poverty, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (4), 1577-1625.

Cheung, M & Berlin, MP 2014, The Impact of a food for education program on schooling in Cambodia, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2(1), 44-57.

Cunha, JM, De Giorgi, G & Jayachandran, S 2015, The Price Effects of Cash versus In Kind Transfers, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 735.

Currie, J & Gahvari, F 2008, Transfers in Cash and In Kind: Theory Meets the Data, Journal of Economic Literature, 46 (2), 333-383.

Del Ninno, C & Dorosh, PA 2003, In Kind transfer and household food consumption: implications for targeted food programs in Bangladesh, The Journal of Development Studies, 40 (1), 48-78.

French, SA, Wall, M & Mitchell, NR 2010, Household income differences in food sources and food items purchased, International Journal of Behavior al Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7 (77), 1-8.

Gentilini, U 2007, Cash and Food Transfer: A Primer, World Food Programme Rome, Italy.

Gertler, PJ, Martinez, S, Premand, P, Rawlings, LB & Vermeersch, CM 2011, Impact Evaluation in Practice, IBRD/The World Bank, Washington DC.

Giles, J & Satriawan, E 2015, Protecting Child Nutritional Status in the Aftermath of A Financial Crisis: Evidence from Indonesia, Journal of Development Economics, 114 (C), 97-106.

Hastuti, Mawardi, S, Sulaksono, B, Akhmadi, S, Devina, S & Artha, RP 2008, Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Raskin, Lembaga Penelitian SEMERU, Jakarta.

Hastuti, Sulaksono, B & Mawardi, S 2012, Tinjauan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Raskin dalam Mencapai Enam Tepat, Working Paper, Lembaga Penelitian SEMERU, Jakarta.

Headey, DD 2013, The Impact of the Global Food Crisis on Self Assessed Food Security, The World Bank Economic Review, 27 (1), 1-27.

Hoynes, HW & Schanzenbach, DW 2009, Consumption Responses to In Kind Transfer: Evidence from the Introduction of the Food Stamp Program, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 109-139.

Isdijoso, W, Hastuti, Mawardi, S, Budiyati, S, Rosfadila, M, Febriany, V & Sodo, J 2011, Persepsi RTS terhadap Pelaksanaan dan Manfaat Program: Studi Kasus di Tiga Kelurahan di Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Research Report, Kerjasama antara Biro Kesejahteraan Sosial Setda Provinsi DKI Jakarta dengan Lembaga Penelitian SMERU.

Khandker, SR, Koolwal, GB & Samad, HA 2010, Handbook on Impact Evaluation: Quantitative Methods and Practices, IBRD/World Bank, Washington DC.

Khush, G 2004, Harnessing Science and Technology for Sustainable Rice Based Production Systems’, Paper, Presented at the Paper presented at the Conference on Rice in Global Markets and Sustainable Production Systems, February 12-13, 2004, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Rome, Italy.

Laksono, A 2014, Pedoman Umum Pelaksanaan Raskin 2014, Tim Koordinasi Raskin Pusat dan Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Jakarta.

Maccini, SL & Yang, D 2009, Under the Weather: Health, Schooling, and Economic Consequences of EarlyLife Rainfall, American Economic Review, 99 (3), 1006-1026.

Matriz, MJ, Molina, I, Valera, HG, Mohanty, S & Jamora, N 2010, Global rice demand: Is rice really becoming an inferior good?, Paper, Presented at the 28th International Rice Research Conference, November 8-12, 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam.

McBeth, J 1998, Return to roots: Indonesia could revive its battered economy by funneling more resources into an old stand by food production, Far Eastern Economic Review, 161 (23), 64-65.

Moreira, PA & Padrao, PD 2004, Educational and Economic Determinants of Food Intake in Por- tuguese Adults: A Cross Sectional Survey, BMC Public Health, 4 (58), 1-11.

Olken, BA 2006, Corruption and the costs of redistribution: Micro evidence from Indonesia, Journal of public economics, Vol. 90 (4), pp. 853-870.

Pangaribowo, EH 2012, The Impact of Rice for the Poor on household consumption, Paper prsented at the 56th AARES Annual Conference, February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Western Australia.

Rasyid, M 2012, Efek disinsentif program Raskin dan pengaruh terhadap transfer pangan antargenerasi, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 13 (1), 146-161.

Rejesus, RM, Mohanty, S & Balagtas, JV 2012, Forecasting Global Rice Consumption, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University.

Ruelle, M & Rockmore, M 2011, Understanding safety nets: a primer for international development, Policy Brief, Cornell University: Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management.

Satriawan, E, Perdana, A & Prima, R 2015, Pembelajaran dari uji coba desain baru Raskin 2012: Temuan dari Studi Pemantauan TNP2K, Working Paper, TNP2K 28, Jakarta.

Senauer, B & Young, N 1986, The Impact of Food Stamps on Food Expenditure: Rejection of the Traditional Model, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (1), 37-43.

Southworth, HM 1945, The Economics of Public Measures to Subsidize Food Consumption, Journal of Farm Economics, 27 (1), 38-66.

Strauss, J & Thomas, D 1998, Health, Nutrition, and Economic Development, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 766-817.

Strauss, J, Witoelar, F, Sikoki, B & Wattie, A 2009, The Fourth Wave of the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS4): Overview and Field Report, RAND Labor and Population Working Paper Series.

Sumarto, S, Suryahadi, A & Widyanti, W 2005, Assessing the impact of Indonesian social safety net programs on household welfare and poverty dynamics, The European journal of development research, 17 (1), 155-177.

Suryahadi, A, Yumna, A, Raya, UR & Marbun, D 2010, Review of Government’s Poverty Reduction Strategies, Policies, and Programs in Indonesia: The SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta.

Tabor, S & Sawit, M 2005, RASKIN: A Macro Program Assessment, Laporan Penelitian, <>, viewed September 10, 2015.

Thomas, D, Frankenberg, E, Friedman, J, Habicht, JP, Hakimi, M, Ingwersen, N, Sikoki, B 2006, Causal Effect of Health on Labor Market Outcomes: Experimental Evidence, Working Paper, California Center for Population Research, UCLA.

Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TNP2K) 2015, Tantangan Meningkatkan Efektivitas Program Raskin, Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Sekretariat Wakil Presiden, Jakarta.

Tim Sosialisasi Penyesuaian Subsidi Bahan Bakar Minyak 2013, Pengaman Jaring Sosial Peredam Kenaikan Harga, Warta Anggaran: Majalah Keuangan Sektor Publik, 27, 13-16.

Tsai, S & Tan, L 2006, Food at home Expenditures of Asian Households, Monthly Labor Review (June), 129, 15.

Von Braun, J & Tadesse, G 2012, Global Food Price Volatility and Spikes: An Overview of Costs, Causes, and Solutions, ZEF Discussion Papers on Development Policy, No. 161.

Wilde, PE, Troy, LM & Rogers, BL 2009, Food Stamps and Food Spending: An Engel Function Approach, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 416-430.

Wodon, Q & Zaman, H 2010, Higher Food Prices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Poverty Impact and Policy Responses, The World Bank Research Observer, 25 (1), 157-176.

Word Bank 2012, Raskin Subsidized Rice Delivery, Social Assistance Program and Public Expenditure Review 3, The World Bank, Jakarta.

Zeigler, RS & Barclay, A 2008, The Relevance of Rice, Rice, 1 (1), 3-10.




How to Cite

Girik-Allo, A., Rahayu, Y. P., & Sukartini, N. M. (2016). Impacts of in-kind transfer to household’s budget proportion: Evidence from early reformation in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 19(2), 161–172.