Determinants of the Use of E-Wallet for Transaction Payment among College Students


  • Alwan Sri Kustono Universitas Jember
  • Ardhya Yudistira Adi Nanggala Abdurachman Saleh University, Situbondo, East Java, Indonesia
  • Imam Mas’ud Universitas Jember



perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward usage, behavioral intention to use


This study aims to determine the factors that influence behavioral intentions to use E-wallet. The factors tested include application quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude toward using. The population in this study is college students in Jember Regency, Indonesia. Data analysis is carried out using Variance-based Partial Least Square. The number of samples used is 180 college students as users of the e-wallet application. Six hypotheses are tested, and four hypotheses are successfully accepted. Perceived ease of use has a positive effect on perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness has a positive effect on attitude toward using e-wallet applications. Attitude plays a vital role in behavioral intentions to use e-wallets. The quality of the e-wallet application does not affect the level of perceived usefulness. The perceived ease of use of the application has no direct effect on attitude. This study's results are beneficial for e-wallet providers to increase the level of the use of e-wallet.

Author Biography

Alwan Sri Kustono, Universitas Jember



Adhiputra, M. W. (2015). Aplikasi Technology Acceptance Model terhadap pengguna layanan internet banking. Kalbisocio, 2(1), 52–63.

Aggorowati, M. A., Iriawan, N., Suhartono, and Gautama, N. (2012). Restructuring and expanding Technology Acceptance Model Structural Equation Model and Bayesian Approach. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 496–504.

Alambaigi, A. & Ahangari, I. (2016). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a predictor model for explaining agricultural experts behavior in acceptance of ICT. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 6(2), 235–247.

Amoroso, D. L. & Magnier-Watanabe, R. (2012). Building a research model for mobile wallet consumer adoption: The case of mobile Suica in Japan. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(1), 94–110.

Bach, M. P., Čeljo, A. & Zoroja, J. (2016). Technology Acceptance model for business intelligence systems: preliminary research. Procedia Computer Science. The Author(s), 100, 995–1001.

Biswas, A. (2016). Impact of social media usage factors on green choice behavior based on Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 11(2), 92–97.

Chen, J. K. (2018). The influence of behavioural intention on third-party e-commerce payment. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1–9.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two. Management Science, 35`(8), 982–1003.

Delone, W. & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9–30.

Leiva, F.M, Climent, S.C., & Cabanillasa, F.L. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 21(1), 25–38.

Galalae, C. & Voicu, A. (2013). Consumer behaviour research: Jacquard Weaving in the Social Sciences. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 1(2), 1–1.

Gbongli, K., Xu, Y. & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019). Extended technology acceptance model to predict mobile-based money acceptance and sustainability: A multi-analytical structural equation modeling and neural network approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13), 1–33.

George, A. (2018). Determinants of behavioral intention to use mobile wallets-a conceptual model. Journal of Management, 5(5), 52–62..

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS19. IV. Badan Penerbit Undip. Available at: <>.

Harsanto, B., & Jatnika, D. (2017). Analysis of intention toward halal products: An empirical study of young consumers. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 20(2), 203-212.

Hidranto, F. 2020, ‘E-Wallet kian tebal di tengah pandemi’, Available at:

Ho, K. F., Ho, C. H. & Chung, M. H. (2019). Theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance of the nursing process information system. PLoS ONE, 14(6), 1–14.

Hussein, Z. (2017). Leading to Intention: The Role of attitude in relation to Technology Acceptance Model in e-learning. Procedia Computer Science, 105(December 2016), 159–164.

Hutami, L. T. H. & Septyarini, E. (2018). Intensi penggunaan electronic wallet generasi millenial pada tiga startup “Unicorn†Indonesia Berdasarkan modifikasi TAM. Jurnal Manajemen, 8(2),136–145.

Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605.

Kumar, K. S., Sivashanmugam, C., & Venkataraman, A. (2018). Intention to use mobile wallet: Extension of TAM model. Journal of Electronic Systems, 8(1), 27-34.

Lai, P. (2017). The literature review of Technology Adoption Models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38.

Liao, S., Hong, J.C., Wen, M.H., Pan, Y.C., & Wu, Y.W. (2018). Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore users’ behavioral intention to adopt a performance assessment system for e-book production. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1601.

Nanggala, A. Y. A. (2020). Use of fintech for payment: Approach to Technology Acceptance Model Modified. Journal of Contemporary Information Technology, Management, and Accounting, 1(1), 1–8.

Olushola, T. & Abiola, J. O. (2017). The Efficacy of technology acceptance model: a review of applicable theoretical models in information technology researches. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Business and Management, 4(11). 2347–3002.

Pishchenko, V. & Myriounis, A. (2016) Consumer' s acceptance of new technology : A netnographic study on self-driving automobiles. Uppsala University.

Priantama, R. (2018). Implementasi Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan Information Systems Success Model (ISSM) dalam mengukur efektifitas penggunaan Sistem Informasi Sikaduku Universitas Kuningan : studi. Jurnal Cloud Information, 3(2), 20–27.

Rizal, A. (2019). Nih! Sepuluh Daftar e-wallet terpopuler di Indonesia 2019 versi iPrice. Info Komputer.

Sakdiyah, L., Effendi, R. & Kustono, A. S. (2019). Analisis penerimaan penggunaan e-learning dengan pendekatan theory of planned behavior (TPB) pada mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas Jember. e-Jeba, JEBA(2), 1–10.

Santika, I. W. & Yadnya, I. P. (2017). Analisis Technology Acceptance Model terhadap penggunaan e-commerce pada UKM kerajinan Di Gianyar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional AIMI, 2015, 255–264.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315

Wang, Y., Zhao, Q. & Zheng, D. (2005). Bottlenecks in production networks: An overview. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(3), 347–363.

Wasiaturrahma, W., Wahyuningtyas, Y. T. & Ajija, S. R. (2019). Non-cash payment and demand for real money in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 1-8

Wong, W. H. & Mo, W. Y. (2019). A study of consumer intention of mobile payment in Hong Kong, based on perceived risk, perceived trust, perceived security and Technological Acceptance Model. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 7(2), 33–38.

Yuwana, A. M. & Kustono, A. S. (2017). Why is User "s expertise important for implementation of regional asset information systems: Case in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(7), 377–379.


Additional Files



How to Cite

Kustono, A. S., Nanggala, A. Y. A., & Mas’ud, I. (2020). Determinants of the Use of E-Wallet for Transaction Payment among College Students. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(1), 85–95.