Peran intellectual capital terhadap market to book value dan return on assets dengan research and development sebagai pemoderasi

Pandu Alvi Baskoro, Suratno Suratno, Syahril Djaddang

Abstract


This study aims to support the role of Research and Development on Intellectual Capital on market value (MtBV) and corporate financial performance (ROA).  Using the Pulic model - Intellectual Value Coefficient (VAIC), this study examines the relationship between value added (VAIC) of the three main corporate resources (ie Physical Capital, Human Capital and Structural Capital), the company's market value (MtBV) and corporate finance ( ROA), and also Research and Development (R&D).  The data is gathered from 43 selected banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017.  Data analysis uses multiple regression.

  The results show that Intellectual Capital (VAIC) does not affect to market value (MtBV), but the compilation of Intellectual Capital (VAIC) developed by Research and Development (R&D) as full moderation can support market value.  Intellectual Capital (VAIC) affects financial performance (ROA), as well as Intellectual Capital (VAIC) supported by Research and Development (R & D) as a quasi-moderation which also strengthening the financial performance (ROA).

Keyword : Intellectual Capital (IC), Market to Book Value (MtBV), Financial Performance (ROA), Research and Development (R&D).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Sawarjuwono dan Kadir, 2003, “Intellectual Capital Disclosure Commitment : Myth or Reality?”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.13, No. 1, pp. 39-56.

Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Adventage” Academy of Manajement, 17:99-120.

Budimanta, Arif. Dkk. 2008. Corporate Social ResponsibilityAlternatif bagi Pembangunan Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta:ICSD.

Bontis, N., Keow, W.C.C., Richardson, S. 2000. “Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian Industries.

Chen, M.C., Cheng, S.J, Hwang, Y. 2005. “An empirical investigation of the relationship between Intellectual Capital and Firm’ market value and Financial Performance”. Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol. 6 No. 2. pp. 159-176

Davenport, Thomas, H., and Laurence Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge : How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Kubo, I., and A. Saka. (2002). “An inquairy into the motivations of knowledge workers in the Japanese financial industry”. Journal of Knowledge Management. 6 (3). pp. 262-271.

Padgett, Robert C. dan Jose I. Galan, 2010, The Effect of Research and Development Intensityon Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol.93.

Pramelasari, Yosi Metta. 2010. Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Terhadap Nilai Pasar dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Pulic dan Bornemann, M. and Leitner, K.H. 1999. “Measuring and reporting intellectual capital: the case of a research technology organisation”, Singapore Management Review, Vol. 24 No.3, pp. 7-19.

Pulic. 2000. “VAIC - An Accounting Tool for IC Management,”. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5).

Sugiyono, 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suwarjono, Tjiptohadi, & Agustine, P.K. (2003). Intelectual capital: perlakuan, penukuran dan pelaporan (sebuah library research). Jurnal akuntansi & keuangan Vol. 5, No.135-57. Universitas Kristen petra.

Trianto. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu, Konsep, Strategis dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ulum, Ihyaul. 2009. “Intellectual Capital : Konsep dan Kajian Empiris”. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/jbb.v9i2.2049

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The 6th International Conference on Business and Banking (ICBB) VI

Abstracting & Indexing

 


Hasil gambar untuk ccby logo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.