Peer Review Process

Article Review Process

This TIAR  Journal involves a review process carried out by competent reviewers tailored to the topic of the manuscript being processed. The review process pays mature attention to each manuscript, providing constructive feedback to add value to the knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the article review process is to select articles for academic publication and research.

Vision

Our vision is to provide an opportunity for professionals in their respective fields to offer a unique and diverse academic perspective for the field.

Values

TIAR Journal values diverse perspectives from various fields and review expertise to provide critical, constructive feedback while respecting the author's work. Reviewers come from various organizations, careers, and backgrounds all over the world.

Ethics

All requests to review abstracts, manuscripts, and review results must be kept confidential. Reviewers are not allowed to share their review results or information about the review process with anyone without the approval of the editor and the authors involved, even after publication.

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for The Indonesian Accounting Review (TIAR) focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turnitin.

Review Process:

1. Author submit the manuscript

2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]

3. Blind peer review process

4. Editor Decision

5. Confirmation to the authors

This journal uses blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.