Peer Review Process

Article Review Process

This TIAR  Journal involves a review process carried out by competent reviewers tailored to the topic of the manuscript being processed. The review process pays mature attention to each manuscript, providing constructive feedback to add value to the knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the article review process is to select articles for academic publication and research.

Vision

Our vision is to provide an opportunity for professionals in their respective fields to offer a unique and diverse academic perspective for the field.

Values

TIAR Journal values diverse perspectives from various fields and review expertise to provide critical, constructive feedback while respecting the author's work. Reviewers come from various organizations, careers, and backgrounds all over the world.

Ethics

All requests to review abstracts, manuscripts, and review results must be kept confidential. Reviewers are not allowed to share their review results or information about the review process with anyone without the approval of the editor and the authors involved, even after publication.

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for The Indonesian Accounting Review (TIAR) focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turnitin.

Article review process:

  1. Authors submit manuscripts through OJS
  2. Initial manuscript evaluation by the Editor [if it does not meet the criteria set by the journal, for example, if there is no novelty in the research or if there are many similar studies, some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
  3. Blind review process by reviewers. This journal uses blind review, meaning that the identities of the reviewers and authors are hidden from each other throughout the review process. At this stage, reviewers provide evaluations and assessments of the article. Reviewers may suggest that the research article needs to be improved by the author, rejected, or can proceed for publication.
  4. Based on the recommendations from the Reviewer, the Editor informs the author whether their research article needs to be improved, rejected, or processed for publication
  5. Official decision by the Editor on whether the article is accepted for publication in The Indonesian Accounting Review.

All review processes are conducted with utmost care while upholding publication ethics