Assessing ISQM 1 Implementation: Evidence from Two Large Public Accounting Firms in Indonesia
PDF

Keywords

ISQM 1
signaling theory
Resource Based View (RBV)

How to Cite

Febriani, Y., & Wondabio, L. S. . (2026). Assessing ISQM 1 Implementation: Evidence from Two Large Public Accounting Firms in Indonesia. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 16(2), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v16i2.5641

How to Cite

Febriani, Y., & Wondabio, L. S. . (2026). Assessing ISQM 1 Implementation: Evidence from Two Large Public Accounting Firms in Indonesia. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 16(2), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v16i2.5641

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation of the International Standard on Quality Management 1 (ISQM 1) in two large public accounting firms in Indonesia, namely KAP ABC and KAP XYZ. ISQM 1 represents a transition from a compliance-based quality control approach toward a risk-based quality management system that emphasizes continuous improvement and proactive risk assessment. Using a qualitative multiple-case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis involving quality management personnel and audit-related documentation. The evaluation is based on the eight components of ISQM 1 and analyzed using the perspectives of Signaling Theory and the Resource-Based View (RBV). The findings indicate that KAP ABC demonstrates a higher level of implementation maturity by integrating ISQM 1 into its governance structure, quality strategy, and internal capability development. In contrast, KAP XYZ tends to implement ISQM 1 primarily as a regulatory compliance mechanism aligned with global network policies. The results highlight that effective ISQM 1 implementation depends not only on regulatory pressure but also on resource readiness, management commitment, and strategic orientation.

PDF

References

Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-Based Theory and the Value Creation Framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936–1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211021655

Basri, H., Widyastuti, T., Kuntadi, C., Ahmar, N., & Dharma Ganesha, P. (2025). Menakar Efektivitas ISQM: Perspektif Global Tentang Mutu Audit dan Tata Kelola Risiko. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perbankan Remittance, 6. https://doi.org/10.56486/remittance.vol6no2.935

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches.

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A Review of Archival Audit Research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2411228

Fauji, L., Sudarma, M., & Achsin, M. (2015). Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Mutu (SPM) dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma JAMAL, 6, 1–174. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.04.6005

Francis, J. R. (2011). A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2020). Basis for Conclusions: ISQM 1, Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IAASB-Strategy-2015-2019_0.pdf

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2024). Handbook of International Quality Management, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services Pronouncements. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). (2024a). Panduan Implementasi Pertama Kali Standar Manajemen Mutu 1 (SMM 1).

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). (2024b). Standar Manajemen Mutu 1 (SMM 1). Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). http://www.iapi.or.id

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). (2025a). Matriks Ilustrasi Risiko Mutu: Panduan Pelengkap Toolkit Manajemen Mutu.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). (2025b). Toolkit Manajemen Mutu.

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2021). The IAASB’s New Quality Management Standards: An Overview. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

Knechel, W. R., & Van Staden, C. J. (2021). Audit quality, regulation, and legitimacy: An institutional perspective on ISQM 1. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 95.

Lam, T. K., & Tuan, N. (2023). Transition VQSC 1 into ISQM 1 - Advantages and Challenges: Vietnam Case Study. ICAEFM. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382428281_TRANSITION_VQSC_1_INTO_ISQM_1_-_ADVANTAGES_AND_CHALLENGES_VIETNAM_CASE_STUDY

Lubenchenko, O. E., Shulha, S. V., & Korinko, M. D. (2022). New Standards of Quality Management in Audit. The Risk-Based Approach. Statistics of Ukraine, 96(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(96)2022.01.11

Nasran, M. A. M. (2025). Assessing the readiness to implement quality management standards 1. Journal Eduvest, 5(5), 5182–5195. https://greenpublisher.id/

Pisani, C. (2022). The Implications of the Revised Audit Quality Management Standards on Local Audit Firms. University of Malta Library.

Rahmawati, Y. R., & Hastuti, T. D. (2023). Implementasi Sistem Pengendalian Mutu pada Kantor Akuntan Publik ABC dengan Basis Value. Jurnal Akun Nabelo, 6.

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882020

Utomo, Z. S. (2024). Do Affiliated Audit Firms in Indonesia Meet Global Quality Benchmarks. Jurnal Revolusi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 7.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.