The Effect of Life Cycle Assessment on Performance Sustainability: The Moderating Roles of Bioaccounting and Smart Environmental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v15i2.5485Keywords:
Life Cycle, performance Sustainability, Bioaccounting, smart environmental, broiler producttion.Abstract
The growing urgency to achieve long-term performance sustainability amidst dynamic environmental challenges presents a significant problem for modern organizations, particularly when life cycle management and ecological accountability are not optimally integrated. This study aims to analyze the effect of life cycle factors on performance sustainability while evaluating the dual moderating roles of bioaccounting and smart environmental in strengthening strategic responses to environmental and operational pressures. A quantitative approach was employed using survey data from corporate respondents, and the analysis was conducted using the Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) technique to test indicator validity and structural relationships across variables. The findings indicate that life cycle significantly influences performance sustainability, and both bioaccounting and smart environmental function as effective moderators that enhance the alignment between corporate strategies and ecological responsibility. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of sustainability-oriented accounting innovation and environmentally intelligent decision-making as foundations for competitive advantage, regulatory compliance, and long-term value creation.
References
Abrol, R. (2025). Indian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networking (IJAINN) AI-Powered Anomaly Detection in Air Pollution for Smart Environmental Monitoring. Indian Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networking (IJAINN), 5, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.54105/ijainn.C1098.05030425
Ahmed, H., Parker, D. C., & Drescher, M. (2025). Adoption determinants and policy tools for residential green stormwater infrastructure: A review synthesizing differences and commonalities among lot-level practices. In Journal of Environmental Management (Vol. 373). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123279
Ahmed, N., Xinagyu, G., Alnafissa, M., Sikder, M., & Faye, B. (2025). Evaluating the impact of sustainable technology, resource utilization, and climate change on soil emissions: A CS-ARDL analysis of leading agricultural economies. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2024.100869
Alam, G. M. I., Arfin Tanim, S., Sarker, S. K., Watanobe, Y., Islam, R., Mridha, M. F., & Nur, K. (2025). Deep learning model based prediction of vehicle CO2 emissions with eXplainable AI integration for sustainable environment. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87233-y
Alfonso-Avila, A. R., Cirot, O., Lambert, W., & Létourneau-Montminy, M. P. (2022). Effect of low-protein corn and soybean meal-based diets on nitrogen utilization, litter quality, and water consumption in broiler chicken production: insight from meta-analysis. Animal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100458
Alhumoudi, H., Alakkas, A. A., Khan, S., Imam, A., Baig, A., Omer, A. M., & Khan, I. A. (2024). Carbon Management Accounting Considerations for Corporate Carbon Reduction: The Limitations and Future of Integrating Life Cycle Assessment and Material Flow Cost Accounting. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(5), 1971–1979. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190536
Almasyhari, A. K., Rachmadani, W. S., Sari, Y. P., & Basrowi. (2025). Strategic decision-making: Linking corporate choices, social responsibility, and environmental accounting in waste management. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101404
Arvandi, A., Marouf, A. Al, Li, Q., Rokne, J., & Alhajj, R. (2025). Extracting information from reddit for emergency management - A case study on British Columbia wildfire. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105354
Aureli, S., Foschi, E., & Paletta, A. (2023). Management accounting for a circular economy: current limits and avenue for a dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2022-5766
Boiger, T., Mair-Bauernfeind, C., Asada, R., & Stern, T. (2025). Optimizing the utilization of harvested wood products for maximum greenhouse gas emission reduction in a bioeconomy: A multi-objective optimization approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123424
Doifode, V. R., Ashok Kumar, R., Stephenraj, M. A., Vishnu Vardhana Naidu, B., Bhatt, C., & Deepa, D. (2024). Development of smart environmental monitoring in nuclear power station using data fusion techniques. In Challenges in Information, Communication and Computing Technology (pp. 343–348). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003559092-59
Einas Azher, Sadia Javed, Hafiz Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui, Farrukh Zafar, & Osama Ahmed. (2025a). Exploring the Impact of Digital Supply Chain Integration on the Firm’s Performance with Mediation and Moderation Role of Knowledge Sharing and Environmental Turbulence. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i1.341
Einas Azher, Sadia Javed, Hafiz Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui, Farrukh Zafar, & Osama Ahmed. (2025b). Exploring the Impact of Digital Supply Chain Integration on the Firm’s Performance with Mediation and Moderation Role of Knowledge Sharing and Environmental Turbulence. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i1.341
Farfan-Lievano, A., Ceballos, O. I., & Mejia Soto, E. (2024). Bioaccounting measurement of environmental assets: beyond environmental accounting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(6), 2001–2033. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2022-1796
Guðjónsdóttir, S. B., Vásquez-Mejía, C. M., Shrivastava, S., & Ögmundarson, Ó. (2025). A life cycle assessment of broiler chicken meat and egg production in Iceland. Poultry Science, 104(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105072
Ippolito, N. M., Amato, A., Ferella, F., Prisciandaro, M., Beolchini, F., Vegliò, F., & Innocenzi, V. (2024). The application of the life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for the treatment of microelectronic industry effluents. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100854
Iqbal Chaudhry, N., Asad, H., Amir Ch, M., & Imitiaz Hussian, R. (2020). Environmental Innovation and Financial Performance: Mediating Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Firm’s Environmental Strategy. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 4(3), 715–737.
Kadawo, A., Sadagopan, M., During, O., Bolton, K., & Nagy, A. (2023). Combination of LCA and circularity index for assessment of environmental impact of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2021.2004562
Kariyasa, K., & Dewi, Y. A. (2011). A CRITIQUE OF THE USE OF THE BALANCED SCORECARD IN MULTI-ENTERPRISE FAMILY FARM BUSINESSES. Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security, 1(3), 1–22.
Kazancoglu, I., Sagnak, M., Kumar Mangla, S., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Circular economy and the policy: A framework for improving the corporate environmental management in supply chains. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2641
Nair, S., Ahamad, S., & Jayabalan, N. (2022). The Adoption of Environmental Management Accounting: A Study on Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 2(6), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ijbm.2022.2.2
Ošlovnik, T., & Denac, M. (2025). Agricultural and Food Product Assessment—Methodological Choices in Sustainability Reporting Using the LCA Method. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156837
Präger, L., Woytowicz, J., Reitberger, R., & Lang, W. (2025). LCA-based calculation of GHG Protocol Scope 3: A bottom-up approach to determine GHG emissions of the construction activity of municipalities. Building and Environment, 285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113502
Sugiharto, W. H., Susanto, H., & Prasetijo, A. B. (2024a). Evaluating Polynomial, and Gaussian Approaches for Temperature Change Sub Index of Water Quality Index for Smart Environmental Management. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 11(9), 2425–2436. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.110915
Sugiharto, W. H., Susanto, H., & Prasetijo, A. B. (2024b). Selecting IoT-Enabled Water Quality Index Parameters for Smart Environmental Management. Instrumentation Mesure Metrologie, 23(4), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.18280/i2m.230401
Wehner, D., Prenzel, T., Betten, T., Briem, A. K., Hong, S. H., & Ilg, R. (2022). The Sustainability Data Science Life Cycle for automating multi-purpose LCA workflows for the analysis of large product portfolios. E3S Web of Conferences, 349. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234911003
Xia, L., Fatema, N., Rahman, M. M., & Hossain, A. (2025). Nexus of environmental management accounting, and carbon emission management on environmental, social, and governance performance: evidence from symmetrical and asymmetrical approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05465-9
Xu, Y., & Zhang, K. (2025). The Impact of Social Security on Farmers’ Green Agricultural Technology Adoption: Empirical Evidence from Rural China. Agriculture, 15(5), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15050498
Zeynali, A., 1, A., Monadi, A., Zarbakhsh, F., Sefidan, M. M., Corresponding, , & Azim, A. Z. (2025). Structural Analysis of the Factors Influencing Smart Environmental Development in the City of Tabriz. Journal of Urban Environmental Management Journal, 3(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.48306/juem.2025.528698.1076
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indonesian Accounting Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.














