The role of auditor assurance and internal control in company performance evaluation by non professional investors

pdf
pdf

Keywords

Pervasive account
Special account
Auditor guarantee
Investment decision
Internal auditor
External auditor

How to Cite

Almilia, Luciana Spica, and Nurul Mustafida. “The Role of Auditor Assurance and Internal Control in Company Performance Evaluation by Non Professional Investors”. The Indonesian Accounting Review, vol. 14, no. 2, Jan. 2025, pp. 239-51, https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v14i2.4385.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the preferences of non-professional investors regarding management disclosures for remediation of internal controls, whether financial statements with internal auditor’s assurance and external auditor’s assurance are more credible than those without assurance. Participants in this study include accounting and management students with knowledge of investment and capital markets, financial statement analysis, and auditing. The total number of research participants is 150 students. The results of the research on pervasive accounts show that (1) there is a significant difference in perceptions of non-professional investors regarding the credibility of financial statements, either without assurance, with internal auditor’s assurance, or with external auditor’s assurance; (2) there is a significant difference in the perception of non-professional investors regarding the level of material weakness of financial statements, either without assurance, with internal auditor’s assurance, or with external auditor’s assurance; (3) there is a significant difference in the perception of non-professional investors regarding the level of material weakness of financial statements, either without assurance, with internal auditor’s assurance, or with external auditor’s assurance; (4) there is no significant difference in the perception of non-professional investors regarding the desire to buy shares, either without collateral, with internal auditor’s assurance, or with external auditor’s assurance.

References

Aghazadeh, S., and M, Peytcheva. (2017). The mismatch between expectations and realities of AS4 Audits: A post-implementation research analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 37(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51742.

Archambeault, D., DeZoort, F. T., and Holt, T. P. (2008). The need for an internal auditor report to external stakeholders to improve governance transparency. Accounting Horizons, 22(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.4.375.

Beneish, M., M. Billings., and L, Hodder. (2008). Internal control weaknesses and information uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 665–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.665.

Boyle, DM, FT DeZoort, and DR Hermanson. 2015. The effects of internal audit report type and reporting relationship on internal auditors’ risk judgments. Accounting Horizons, 29(3), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51110

Carcello, JV, DR Hermanson, and K. Raghunandan. 2005. Changes in internal auditing during the time of the major US accounting scandals. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2) 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00273.x.