Employee’s productivity at the operation of indonesian railway

Muhammad Alkirom Wildan

Abstract


This research was done to study the effect of the physical work environment and nonphysical workplace environment on employee’s productivity. It was conducted at the Indonesian Railway Corp. operation district 8. The population consists of 250 employees and the sample was determined using Slovin’s equation with the size 71 employees. The data was taken using a questionnaire and analyzed using linear regression to analyze the partial and simultaneous effect of the physical work envi-ronment and nonphysical workplace environment towards employee’s productivity. Based on the statistical analysis conducted using SPSS 18, the p-Value of the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment are 0.013 and 0.036 respectively, both are less than 0.05. Thus, it indicates that the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment significantly and partially affect employee’s productivity, while the F-count is 14.831 and its p-Value is 0.000 (<0.05) indicating that physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity. The regression coefficient (R2) was 0.504 or 50.4 %. Therefore, it also shows that the physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity about 50.4%, and about 49.6% might be affected by other variables.


Keywords


environment,non physical

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akinyele, S. T. (2010). The influence of work envi-ronment on workers productivity: A case of se-lected oil and gas industry in Lagos, Nige-ria. African Journal of Business Manage-ment, 4(3), 299-307.

Altman, I., & Lett, E. E. (1970). The ecology of inter-personal relationships: A classification system and conceptual model. Social and psychologi-cal factors in stress, 177-201.

Dole, C., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). The impact of various factors on the personality, job satisfac-tion and turnover intentions of professional ac-countants. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(4), 234-245.

Lan, L., & Lian, Z. (2009). Use of neurobehavioral tests to evaluate the effects of indoor environ-ment quality on productivity. Building and En-vironment, 44(11), 2208-2217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.001

Matharuddin, N. A. (2003). Kajian terhadap keberkesanan pengurusan fasiliti bagi bangunan pejabat di Plaza Mont'Kiara: kajian kes. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate.

Massoudi, A. H., & Hamdi, S. S. A. (2017). The Consequence of work environment on Em-ployees Productivity. IOSR Journal of Busi-ness and Management, 19(01), 35-42.

Pangumpia, F. (2013). Pengaruh iklim komunikasi organisasi terhadap produktivitas kerja karya-wan di bank prisma dana manado. Jurnal Acta Diurna, 2(2).

Render, B., & Heizer, J. (2001). Prinsip-prinsip Mana-jemen Operasi. Terjemahan). PT Salemba Em-ban Patria, Jakarta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i1.1838

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


The 6th International Conference on Business and Banking (ICBB) VI

Abstracting & Indexing

  

 

Hasil gambar untuk ccby logo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.