Audit committee characteristics and earnings management practices
PDF
PDF

Keywords

Audit committee
earnings management
good corporate governance
Modified Jones Model
Performance-Adjusted Modified Jones Model.

How to Cite

Nelwan, M. L., & Tansuria, B. I. (2019). Audit committee characteristics and earnings management practices. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i1.1400
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study revisits the effectiveness of the audit committee independence and expertise in preventing earnings management practices.  Studies in other studies with relatively stricter regulations showed the audit committee independence was effective to prevent earnings management.  On the contrary, studies in Indonesia were arguably outdated and shorter in period.  This study was conducted on Indonesian listed-manufacturing companies from 2009 to 2015. It used two earnings management model such as Modified Jones Model and Performance-Adjusted Modified Jones Model. The results showed that audit committee independence is effective to prevent earnings management practices.  However, it was found that audit committee expertise did not affect earnings management practices.  The results are consistent for both earnings management models. Although majority of the audit members in Indonesian listed manufacturing companies are experts in accounting and finance, the existence of those expert members did not affect the companies to engage or not engage in earnings management practices.  However, the accounting and/or financial expertise does not determine the effectiveness of the audit committee’s monitoring role.

References

American Bar Association. 1999, “Report and recommendations of the blue ribbon Committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committeesâ€, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 1067–1095.

Australian Stock Exchange. 2003, “ASX principles of corporate governance and best practice recommendationsâ€, Australian Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Council.

BAPEPAM-LK. 2004, “Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal. No.: Kep-29/PM/2004, tentang pembentukan dan pedoman pelaksanaan kerja komite auditâ€, Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal., available at: http://eodb.ekon.go.id/download/peraturan/lainlain/lainlain/KepKaBapepam_29_2004.pdf.

Beasley, M.S. 1996, “An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraudâ€, The Accounting Review, Vol. 71 No. 4, pp. 443–465.

Bedard, J., Chtourou, S.M. and Courteau, L. 2004, “The effect of audit committee expertice, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings managementâ€, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 13–35.