The fraud portrait in budget planning by the regional government apparatus
PDF
PDF

Supplementary Files

POTRET FRAUD PADA PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN PERANGKAT DAERAH

Keywords

Budgeting Planning
Estimate
fraud

How to Cite

Indriani, N., Alim, M. N., & Haryadi, B. (2019). The fraud portrait in budget planning by the regional government apparatus. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i1.1374

Abstract

This study aims to identify the existence of fraud that appears in the practice of budget preparation. It is a case study conducted in Blue Zone Regional Device by using participant observation method. The informants were the financial managers. The results showed that fraud on budgeting involves all parties ranging from planners, PPTKs, executive staff, and exchequer. Besides that, fraud on budgeting occurs in the form of commitments (fees), separation of funds for non-budgetary activities (pressure), the use of legal gaps that are less effective supervision system (opportunity) and assume reasonable what is done and all the Regional Tools do their jobs (rationalization)

References

Abdullah, Syukriy dan Jhon Andra Asmara. (2007). Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif dalam Penganggaran Daerah : Bukti Empiris Atas Aplikasi Agency di sektor Publik, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia 10 (1).

Abdullah, Sukriy. 2009. Penelitian APBD: Pengantar untuk Agency Theory.

Albrecht, W. Steve. (2009). Fraud Examination, Fourth Edition. Ohio: Cengage Learning.

Albrecht, Albrecht, Albrecht, Zimbelman. (2012). Fraud Examination. South Western.

Arfiansyah, Sulton. (2015). Dominasi Peran Politik Anggaran Dalam Pembangunan dan Ke-mandirian Daerah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Slider 9 gambar (bolak balik autoplay)