Matching Cost Against Revenue at Royalty Expenses


PDF
PDF

Keywords

intangible asset
matching cost against revenue
royalty
sales.

How to Cite

Santoso, Muhammad Rifky. “Matching Cost Against Revenue at Royalty Expenses”. The Indonesian Accounting Review, vol. 11, no. 2, July 2021, pp. 171-85, https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v11i2.2558.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The recording of royalty expenses must not only be consistent but also complied with the principle of matching costs against revenue, especially in calculating taxable income. If all accounting principles are not met in recording the royalty expense, the tax authority will correct it  so that the royalty expenses cannot be deducted from taxable income. By using a case in a tax court in Indonesia, there is a taxpayer who does not meet the matching cost against revenue principle when recording royalty expenses. The taxpayer deducts these royalty expenses for the previous year in the current year because the amounts of these royalty expenses are known exactly in the current year. Even though the taxpayer's financial statements were audited and had an unqualified opinion, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) as the tax authority in Indonesia negated the royalty expenses as a deduction from taxable income. This paper finds that a net sales-based royalty fee scheme can be estimated at the end of the year and deducted from gross income without waiting for a certainty on the amount of royalty expense on invoices received in the coming year. The accounting records of the taxpayer are not proper so that some data or documents cannot be proven in the tax court. The method of recording in the financial statements with an unqualified opinion does not guarantee that the recording follows tax regulations, especially following Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

References

Armstrong, Christopher S., Jennifer L. Blouin, and David F. Larcker. 2012. “The Incentives for Tax Planning.†Journal of Accounting and Economics 53(1–2): 391–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001.

Aubert, François, and Gary Grudnitski. 2014. “The Impact of SOX on Opportunistic Management Behavior.†International Review of Financial Analysis 32: 188–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2013.12.003.

Bayer, Ralph-c, Harald Oberhofer, and Hannes Winner. 2015. “The Occurrence of Tax Amnesties : Theory and Evidence ☆.†Journal of Public Economics 125: 70–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.02.006.

Bousquet, Alain, Helmuth Cremer, Marc Ivaldi, and Michel Wolkowicz. 1998. “Risk Sharing in Licensing.†International Journal of Industrial Organization 16: 535–54.

Brushwood, James D., Derek M. Johnston, and Stephen J. Lusch. 2018. “The Effect of Tax Audit Outcomes on the Reporting and Valuation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits.†Advances in Accounting 42(June): 1–11.