Human Development, Banking Development and the Quality of Local Government: The Case of Indonesia
PDF
PDF

Keywords

Human development
banking development
financial literacy
quality of local government
Indonesia

How to Cite

Cahyaningsih, D., & Trinugroho, I. (2017). Human Development, Banking Development and the Quality of Local Government: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 20(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v20i1.843
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

We extend the study of Trinugroho et al. (2015) by focusing on the effect of human development on banking development and the moderating effect of the quality of local government on the link between human development and banking development. We use unique data set by disentangling the type of banks (commercial bank, rural bank, and the total of both) to measure financial development. This research uses panel data at the provincial level for the period of 2010-2014. Generally, it could be concluded that human development has positive effect on banking development. To some extent, the quality of local government is found to strengthen the impact of human development on banking development.  

References

Altunbaş ,Y., Thornton, J., 2012. Does financial development reduce corruption?. Economics Letters, 114:221–223

Ang, J. B. 2011. Savings Mobilization, Financial Development and Liberalization: The Case of Malaysia Review of Income and Wealth, Series 57, Number 3, September 2011

Astuti, P.H., Trinugroho, I. 2016. Financial Literacy and Engagement in Banking. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research 17(1), 1-6.

Crouzille, C.M., Nys, E., Sauviat, A., 2012. Contribution of Rural Banks to Regional Economic Development: Evidence From The Philippines. Regional Studies, 46:6, 775-791

Galindo, A., Micco A. (2004) “Creditor Protection and Financial Markets: Empirical Evidence and Implications for Latin America,†Federal Reserve ank of Atlanta Economic Review Q2, 29–37.