Fiscal Decentralization and Income Inequality: A Prediction Using the SEM Model
PDF
PDF

Keywords

Fiscal decentralization
Income inequality
Indonesia
Regional economic development

How to Cite

Roy, J., Wijaya, A., Darma, D. C., & A, E. K. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization and Income Inequality: A Prediction Using the SEM Model. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 24(3), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v24i3.2681
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Economic development in a region is not only measured by the fiscal dimension and
the economic growth but also based on the income distribution. This study aims to
analyze the effect of fiscal decentralization on investment, economic growth, economic structure, employment opportunities, and income inequality between districts/cities in East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. This study uses panel data (2013-2019) of the amalgamation of seven districts and three cities in East Kalimantan Province, analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM). The findings show that regional tax plays a crucial role in enhancing regional investment, economic growth, and employment opportunities. It is also important for reducing the economic structure imbalance and income inequality. Profit-sharing funds improve regional investment, economic growth, and employment opportunities. At the same time, special allocation increases employment opportunities and economic structure imbalance. Furthermore, regional retribution increases employment opportunities and reduces the economic structure imbalance, but it harms regional economic growth. The practical implications offer solutions to the realization of local revenue sources for economic development and alleviation of social problems, such as employment opportunities and inequality in welfare.

References

Akai, N., & Sakata, M. (2004). Fiscal Decentralization Contributes to Economic Growth: Evidence from State-Level Cross-Section Data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics 52(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9

Aslan, A., Darma, D. C., & Wijaya, A. (2019). Have Village Funds Impact Growth Economy and Poverty Rate?. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 2601-2605. http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/oct2019/Have-Village-Funds-Impact-Growth-Economy-And-Poverty-Rate.pdf

Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. (1992). Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, New York.

Boadiwaa, Y. A. (2007). The Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth in U.S. Countries. Thesis. Graduate School of The Ohio State University, U.S.

Breton, A. (1996). Competitive governments: An economic theory of politics and public finance. Cambridge Universi-ty Press, UK.