Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) provides a medium for disseminating novel articles related to economy and business among international academics, practitioners, regulators, and public. JEBAV accepts articles any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. In addition, JEBAV focuses on research articles and review article for specific topics that are relevant to the economic, business, and banking issues, related to three important disciplines as follows:

Economics:   Public Economics, International Economics, Banking and Financial InstitutionDevelopment Economics, Monetary Economics, Financial Economics.

Business and banking management:Finance and wealth management, Marketing, Human Resource Management, Strategic Management, Operations, Entrepreneurship,  Banking Ethics, Banking Operation and Management.

Accounting: Public Sector Accounting, Taxation, Financial Accounting, Management Accounting, Auditing, and Information Systems

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similiarity score by using Turnitin.

Review Process:

1. Author submit the manuscript

2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]

3. Double-blind peer review process

4. Editor Decision

5. Confirmation to the authors

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process.

Reviewer Guideline

Components and evaluation indicator Reviewers assessment are described in the following Table:

No

Component

Evaluation Indicator of reviewer

1

Title

Effectiveness, Specification and clarity

2

Abstract (in English)

Complete and describe the essence  of article

3

Keywords

Describing the essential concept of article

4

Introduction (background, Objective or scope, literature Review)

Up-to-date, originality, relevance of the Topic, compatibility of the important reason of the research objective

5

Methods

Accuracy, Specification, and clarity

6

Results   (Analysis and Synthetic)

Analysis acuteness

7

Discussion (Interpretation)

Up-to-date finding, relevance to the interrelated researches, and the scientific contribution effect of finding /idea to the development of science

8

Conclusion

Logical, valid, brief, and clear

9

Suggestion

For practical action, development of new theory, and next/advanced research

10

Bibliography

Degree of up-to-date and the reference of primary book sources.

Rules: at least 90% of the journals or the interrelated scientific researches, above 2008 (year)

 

Publication Frequency

JEBAV is published quarterly, in (April-July), (August-November), and (December-March).

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Article Processing Charges

Every article submitted to Ventura will not have any 'Article Processing Charges'. This includes submitting, peer-reviewing, editing, publishing, maintaining and archiving, and allows immediate access to the full text versions of the articles.

 

Screening for Plagiarism

Originality and Plagiarism

In publishing, Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) strongly against any case of plagiarism on its own merits. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) commits to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and authors are so advised. Also, significant parts of the work have not been published. The author also respects entirely Author Guideline of Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) regarding the redundant, duplicate or fraudulent publication.

Before the author(s) submit the manuscript to Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) please conducting check first for similarity.

Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy, Ventura (JEBAV) does affiliate with Turnitin

 

The Article has not been published in other media and does not contain elements of plagiarism. We recommend that the authors should use reference management software, such as Mendeley, Zotero, or RefWorks.

 

Copy Editing and Proofreading

Every article accepted by Ventura shall be subject to have passed the Grammarly® writing-enhancement program conducted by Ventura Editorial Board.

 

Ethics Statement

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Hasil gambar untuk logo cope

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.